Affiliate Program Partnership: Go All-In, Get More Personal and Own It All the Way

In the current economic climate, instead of casting a wide net and pumping budget into the duopolistic marketing machines, it may be time to think more intentionally with your advertising dollar. Consider shifting your ad spend to a more strategic, low-risk channel such as performance marketing. Take a step back and rethink who you partner with and how you partner with them. Perhaps, go deep and enlist a small but meaningful group of trusted partnerships to collaborate and get true traction. These should be partners you know by first name and can work with on a one-one-one basis to identify your ideal collective audiences.

(Wait? Did I just say, collective? Yup, more on that later.) 

It’s time to take ownership of your best relationships. Own the relationships directly (through an in-house program, for example) or indirectly (via a network) — it doesn’t matter. But be a relationship steward, not a control freak. Provide your partners with the tools and data to give them autonomy, but build in shared accountability. These special partners are the pick of your portfolio. Set them up for success. 

In this type of arrangement, you and your partner own the outcomes together, end-to-end. Sure, the alignment of incentives is technically what affiliate marketing is all about, but it doesn’t always look that way in practice. Why do it? A smaller group of high-quality partnerships can lead to greater audience insight and more profitable campaigns for brands — and more targeted and personalised offers for consumers. 

Here’s how to make one-to-one partnerships work for you.

Owning the strategy together: collective thinking

The collective customer

The first step is to create a truly shared understanding of your collective customer. Given that the partner is responsible for helping you source this customer, you have to come to terms with the fact that this is a customer you share with your partner. Maybe not forever, but perhaps so — it’s up to the customer. 

If you are all-in, you’ve already bought into the notion that the partnership drives incremental value. (Otherwise, why bother?) That value originates in the information gaps that a consumer simply cannot fill through you (or your website) alone. These gaps could be a comparison against your competitors, or an unbiased assessment of your product or service, or a recommendation from a friend. Letting go of the question of “whose customer” he or she may be frees you to work together for the collective customer. 

Once you confirm your ideal collective customers with your partners, they should share some of their most insightful data about those customers, like the qualities that indicate a repeat buyer, or signs that point to a subscription renewal. If they’re good, your partners will know more about what it takes to land these consumers than you do. They may know which types of users increasingly invest in your products or services, which advocate your brand to their friends, which go to your competitors, and even what incentives are most effective in generating interest for different personas. Think about all of the ways you can use this valuable information to improve your profitability. 

Moments of truth

With that collective knowledge, you should work backwards, together. This means asking your partners: 

  • Where do you find audiences?
  • What keywords do you use?
  • What were these customers looking for?
  • What offers ‘sealed the deal’?
  • Where can you find more that look like them? 
  • And, most importantly, “What was the ‘moment of truth’ that caused them to seek out your site?” 

If you have a great relationship with your partner, these questions can reveal learnings that you otherwise wouldn’t find. Expect to have these conversations often, and not with the intention to steal your partner’s secret sauce, but rather to work harder to help them find you more customers, faster. 

While you’re at it, look at the profitability of acquiring different types of customers through this partner. Can you provide them with enough offers and data to enable them to serve the right offer at the moment of truth? Consider working together on a test plan to see which offers resonate best with which audiences, looking at trends such as user behavior, user motivation, and media consumption. 

Your commitments

With the true collective customer in mind, sit down with your partner and set objectives and KPIs for acquiring them. This means treating your partner as an extension of your business, sharing your business goals, and being transparent about what you need from them. How do you make it worth your partner’s while to invest their time and energy into achieving your goals? A good place to start is explaining the tactics you’re already using to attract these customers and what a successful partnership means to you. 

Policy busters

Once plans are established, think about the barriers that could stand in the way of your top partners and their ability to achieve your goals. Ask yourself, “For my top partners, do the policies I have in place work in concert or in opposition with their practices?” Not saying to redefine your moral compass, but to take a good hard look in the mirror and assess what rules you are asking your top partners to work around. Consider what it would mean to remove some of that friction. 

When I ran a network (a few years back), we used to call this exercise “policy-busters.” I recommend you try a similar exercise in a whiteboard session with your team. Some policies are relics because no one took the time to periodically review them or question them. For the top partners who are working hard for you, can you find marketing policies, customer service policies, and pricing policies that need a second look? 

Incentives

Speaking of policies, take a good look at your pricing policies and payout structures to make sure your rewards are commensurate with the actions your partners are asked to take. The harder the task, the higher the pay. For example, are they willing to create custom experiences and integrations with your site? If you need net-new customers, can you double the payout? If you are looking to reward loyalty, can you set up a payout that incentivizes quality or product adoption? 

Owning the execution: tools and data

If you go all-in with a partner, you have to ensure you provide the necessary tools and data to help them personalise an offer at the moment of truth. This is not an easy one to solve. 

For example, if partners are going to target customers in real time, what information do they need to make to serve a distinct ad live. What kinds of pipes (e.g., APIs, integrations) are required to help your partners segment their audiences for you (e.g., new vs. existing customers)? What is required to test offers? What data do they need to create custom audiences? This kind of personalisation is only possible when you are collectively owning the process of growing customers with your partners. 

Owning the optimisation: operating rhythm mentality

And lastly, it is about a commitment to change. With great data comes great responsibility. As in a commitment to ask the right questions and figure out what is working, what is not, and iterating. This is what it’s all about. 

Think about how often you review data together. Think about how often you will review the data. And think about holding each other accountable to taking actions that move the relationship forward on a quarterly basis. Carve out the time, commit to an operating rhythm, and invest in each other’s success. That’s how one-to-one partnerships are done. 

The post Affiliate Program Partnership: Go All-In, Get More Personal and Own It All the Way appeared first on PerformanceIN.

,Read More

Finance is the new marketing: Why some ad tech companies are paying publishers early

Back in March as the coronavirus crisis was rapidly taking a grip around the world, I wrote that “finance is the new creative” as CFOs were forced to seek new liquidity avenues to prevent their businesses from facing a cash crunch. Now — for a handful of ad tech companies at least — finance has become the new marketing.

In a move that’s part customer service, part-flex, some ad tech companies have been offering to pay their publisher clients early. PubMatic, for example, paid all its publishers three days early for the entire second quarter. In July, fellow supply-side platform TripleLift also began paying its publishers three days early.

Lengthening payment terms and late payments have plagued the digital ad industry for years. Like so many other aspects of business, the coronavirus crisis accelerated an existing trend. Digiday research published in June found 62% of publishers were experiencing late payment problems.

As many marketers reined in their spending — at least in the earlier throes of the pandemic — publishers became highly scrutinous of their ad tech vendors. Again, nothing new here. “Sequential liability” has become a Voldemort-like utterance in the volatile ad market. It’s a risk that was hammered home by the high-profile bankruptcy of demand-side platform Sizmek, which left many publishers out of pocket. Nobody wants to be stuck holding the baby again. Cognizant of these concerns, SSPs including PubMatic, OpenX and Triplift recently added payment protection lines and insurance plans to cover any potential DSP failures as the coronavirus crisis wore on.

Early payments have become another way ad tech vendors can peacock an outward display of their apparent financial heft and create an apparent competitive advantage.

Oarex — an invoice factoring firm that works with demand-side platforms, supply-side platforms, agencies and digital media companies — found that early payments hit a year-to-date high in May, with 49% of payments arriving early. Also that month, payments that were late by more than two weeks fell to an 18-month low. The trend has continued since. From January to June, payments were arriving on average eight days late and with total payment terms of 59 days. But in July, payments were on average arriving four days early and with an average term of 52 days.

Jeffrey Hirsch, Pubmatic chief commercial officer, said the company’s early payments gesture was, “announced more internally, [we were] not trying to use it as a marketing tactic.” Now there has been a rebound in the programmatic ad market, there are no plans to continue the program again in the third quarter.

“We are set up to do it again if necessary,” said Hirsch. “We have an extremely strong balance sheet [and we were] able to put it to use in a way that was very productive for [publishers] in a way that was not a significant stress on us to do.”

DSPs often pay later than their stated terms, said TripleLift chief strategy officer Ari Lewine. However, he added, they’ve surprisingly been paying less late recently.

“This is a way of passing on a lot of the goodwill we have been given ourselves,” Lewine said. “Hopefully we can create positive feedback loops where everybody is paying each other a little bit sooner than normal.”

That could be a tad overoptimistic. 

Oarex owes the positive payment upswings to two — temporary — recent trends. The first: Over the last few months many digital media firms had received cash injections in the form of government PPP and SBA loans. (TripleLift, for example, received between $2 million and $5 million, which Lewine said was specifically used to bring back furloughed employees.)

The second: April and May this year, scores of advertisers and vendors began extending their payment terms. Firms that had always historically paid “late” became “early” payers. And not every company has jumped aboard the “early” payment train: Payments late by more than 15 days jumped 54% in June versus May, according to Oarex’s invoice data.

Plus, it’s unclear what the future holds for the economy, given a recent spike of infections in many U.S. states and countries, uncertainty about when a vaccine could become readily available and rising unemployment. IPG’s Magna Global does not expect a global ad market recovery until 2021, but even then, the sector will be $9 billion smaller than it was pre-covid.

“It would take a significant injection of liquidity into a problematic landscape in order for [early payments] to truly be a trend,” said Bernard Urban, CEO at Silverblade, a company that offers accounts receivable financing solutions to advertiser and media clients. “I think there’s a lot of treading water going on and once the waves get a little rougher treading water is going to be harder to do.”

If early payments aren’t a digital media trend that’s likely to stick around once the world emerges from the other side of the coronavirus crisis, perhaps greater financial transparency is one that will. In a highly competitive and somewhat commoditized environment, could showing off a flush balance sheet replace hiring the fancy yacht at Cannes as the go-to ad tech marketing tactic? Well, maybe this year.

Throughout the coronavirus crisis “publisher partners often did want to have a deeper financial conversation with us than they previously had: They wanted to understand how we managed credit and understand our financial stability,” said PubMatic’s Hirsch. “We provided more financial data under NDA than we ever have before to help people feel confident and safe in this environment.”

The post Finance is the new marketing: Why some ad tech companies are paying publishers early appeared first on Digiday.

,Read More