How are Publishers Innovating in Response to COVID-19?

Industries globally are facing the biggest challenge in recent memory, as the world fights against COVID-19. The pandemic has also reshaped our society and the way we live our everyday lives, directing everyone and everything into the online world. Brands now need to find a balance between increasing sales and maintaining healthy enough long-term margins. This means acting smartly and building momentum. Over a third of consumers (37%) believe brands should advertise as normal according to recent data from GlobalWebIndex – both brands and publishers must be responsible today in order to build loyalty for tomorrow. 

Online opportunity boosting network traffic

There is a huge and steadily growing online opportunity for brands looking to maintain loyalty, particularly as content publishers experience higher shares of network orders in response to lockdown orders, with increases of 20% week-by-week. There is, however, uncertainty in the air and consumer engagement with ads has fluctuated somewhat in recent months, with many regions experiencing a drop in activity in February and early March. However, in recent weeks, we have seen an increase in activity globally. In the UK specifically, affiliate clicks have been increasing since mid-March, and this month orders are up, with the sporting goods vertical experiencing an increase in share of total orders.  Whilst consumer behaviours will continue to adapt to the changing climate, there is opportunity for both advertisers and publishers to deliver campaigns and engage with their audiences.

Talk of a global recession will increase the challenge of getting consumers to part with their hard-earned cash on items that they ‘want’ rather than ‘need’, having become increasingly aware of anything deemed ‘non-essential’. Many brands and retailers will have been feeling the impact of recent demand drying up, and whilst we have seen deal sites growing their share of traffic in the UK by 72% year-over-year at the end of March, cashback and loyalty have been less a utilised option, and have experienced a decline in share of orders, however remain a key opportunity for brands to leverage. At this time, publishers will continue to play an important role for shoppers as they search for ways to reduce the reticence around ‘non-essential’ purchases. Brands that do not typically work with a diverse publisher mix could enjoy a significant boost by diversifying and partnering with publishers able to provide additional incentives to consumers. 

Recent figures from IMRG showed growth in the health and beauty sector, which grew 31.6% year-on-year for the week commencing March 15th. As well as this uptick in health and wellness across the world, we are now also beginning to see demand for leisure spending make a comeback in China, as the country eases out of lockdown. Whilst Chinese consumers have regained a certain level of confidence in spending, they have also become more selective and conservative when it comes to selecting publisher deals. It is therefore imperative that deals are compelling and catch the eye of the consumer. It may be tempting for brands to offer large discounts as a way to drive traffic, but they must also ensure they avoid damaging margins.  

Solutions to drive growth

In these challenging times, advertisers must seek solutions that will drive growth, meaning publishers are having to rapidly react to the impact of coronavirus to boost engagement and traffic. When it became clear that country-by-country, Europe was heading for lockdown, content and commerce platform Global Savings Group acted swiftly to launch a new initiative: GSG Stay@Home. In fewer than 5 days, it had sourced 135 exclusive discount codes for millions of its users. Each campaign has seen a high level of performance due to the popularity of categories including home entertainment, health & beauty, takeaways, and home and living. Through its innovation of Dynamic.Coupons – which allows advertisers to pursue new coupon strategies, such as up-selling and cross-selling – Global Savings Group has seen a positive effect on performance for publishers in recent weeks. 

It’s vital that publishers continue to create effective ad environments and foster stronger consumer-brand relationships by optimising the data they have available and employing personalisation tools. Machine learning and automation are now providing publishers with valuable tools and insights into the customer behaviour, from consumers’ browsing habits to shopping behaviour, so they can fine-tune their strategies and make smarter, more personalised content-serving decisions in real-time.

Using new methods to help drive consumer engagement and traffic in these uncertain times is vital. In China, 55Haitao launched campaigns targeting COVID-19 essentials both online and offline. It provided users with the most up-to-date information ranging from where to find protective gear, to which advertiser was offering the best deals on certain vitamins to which supermarket had the most extensive supply of essentials. 55Haitao also pivoted their marketing message to encourage ‘buy now, shop later’ options for advertisers. This change encourage consumers to shop, while setting realistics expectations. By utilising all its channels to inform users – not only in China – but also across US and Europe, 55Haitao was able to ensure community engagement and support.

Publishers need to be smart in arming themselves with the insights, strategy and support they need to remain relevant and useful to consumers in these challenging times. Trends in China indicate we will see increased spending in categories like clothing and fashion, entertainment, beauty and travel when the pandemic ends and confidence increases – almost half (40%) of consumers say they will once again begin making major purchases once the COVID-19 outbreak begins to decrease or is over, according to research from GlobalWebIndex. 

People’s purchases have changed through the stages of the pandemic and they will change again in the ‘new normal’. It is undeniable that publishers have an important role to play in meeting changing requirements during these difficult times and acting responsibly now, to support consumers in the future.

The post How are Publishers Innovating in Response to COVID-19? appeared first on PerformanceIN.

,Read More

The PPP divide: While venture-backed publishers get PPP loans, many bootstrapped publishers haven’t

During the last few years in media, venture-backed publishers got to operate one way, while independent publishers had no choice but to operate another. The media world’s experience with the Small Business Administration’s Paycheck Protection Program thus far has felt dismally similar to that dynamic.

Over the past week, smaller publishers have fumed at headlines that several venture-backed media companies. Axios (total capital raised: $57 million, including a $27 million round in December 2019) got a $4.8 million loan. Bustle Digital Group (total funding raised: $80.5 million) received $7.5 million. Meanwhile, many smaller publishers have found themselves shut out. (Axios backtracked and returned its PPP loan on Tuesday, saying it found other funding sources and “the program had become divisive.”)

In private conversations, publishers at small media companies are livid that money intended for small businesses seems to be going to companies that either have access to other sources of funding, or are planning to use the revenue in ways that seem contrary to the PPP’s purpose.

“Morally, I can’t justify it,” said the CEO of one mid-sized digital publisher with fewer than 500 staffers but decided not to apply. “Who are we to ask for PPP? It doesn’t make any sense.”

Bustle Digital Group, which laid off 24 people at the beginning of April, said in a statement this week that it would use the $7.5 million it got from the PPP to expand the hours it was giving to freelancers, while also reducing pay cuts it had instituted recently. BDG would not make an executive available for this story.

Axios CEO Jim VandeHei wrote on Tuesday that forgoing the PPP loan, which was revealed just a week earlier in an Axios piece, was done because of the issue becoming polarized and an unnamed “alternative source” of capital materialized. Axios would not comment on the record or detail the source of capital.

While many media companies were ineligible for the funds – including an estimated two thirds of U.S. newspapers – a number of small companies were able to get their applications approved.

But many of the smaller publishers that have gotten funds so far have done so almost in spite of their banks, rather than because of them. Two smaller publishers that received PPP funding said they got their applications started by obsessively reloading their banks’ websites on the day their application portals were supposed to launch, rather than wait for the banks to announce they were working. The cofounder of one of those publishers said their application had been processed two hours before their bank sent out an announcement that the bank was now accepting applications.

On some level, things have played out this way because of how funds were distributed during the first round of the PPP. Only large banks were able to distribute funds because they already had access to E-Tran, the portal that the SBA uses to process applications.

And aside from rules about the size of the businesses they were to lend to, “the banks had no other guidelines and no other rules,” said Greg Ott, the CEO of Nav, a gateway to loans for small businesses. “So, in some respects, they did what you’d expect them to do: They served their largest and their VIP customers first.”

The post The PPP divide: While venture-backed publishers get PPP loans, many bootstrapped publishers haven’t appeared first on Digiday.

,Read More