‘The net is tightening’ on AI scraping: Annotated Q&A with Financial Times’ head of global public policy and platform strategy

For much of the past year, publishers have been playing defense against AI scraping and copyright uncertainty. But heading into 2026, some see reasons to believe the ground is finally starting to move a little more in their favor.

The Financial Times was the first U.K.-based publisher to strike a licensing deal with OpenAI in 2024. It has yet to agree to terms with another consumer LLM, but Matt Rogerson, FT’s director of global public policy and platform strategy, believes 2026 will bring a kind of reset as big tech companies alter their stance on AI licensing to avoid future legal risk. And he believes AI scraping is reaching a new phase.

“Every publisher has spent the last two years trying to close down all the loopholes, or perceived loopholes, in their website securities,” he said. “There are still gaps. There’s still really no big enough stick to stop entrepreneurs from using scraping for higher platforms to try and get behind paywalls and then scrape content from publisher sites. But I think that the net is tightening [around AI scraping].”

Continue reading this article on digiday.com. Sign up for Digiday newsletters to get the latest on media, marketing and the future of TV.

,Read More

Media Buying Briefing: How the holdcos fared in 2025, according to Comvergence

In some ways, the total of wins, losses and successful retentions of accounts by the major agency holding companies in 2025 went about as one would expect. Publicis came out on top and WPP came out on the bottom. But the provisional tally for 2025 held a few surprises as well.

In almost unprecedented fashion, Publicis blew away its rival holding companies by a gigantic margin, landing $9.5 billion in wins and only $1.6 billion in losses. And, well, WPP ended the year very much in the negative, having lost more than $2 billion relative to what it won or retained, according to Comvergence’s provisional tally for the year. (The numbers reflect only media wins, not creative.)

This is a member-exclusive article from Digiday. Continue reading it on digiday.com and subscribe to continue reading content like this.

,Read More