Six months in, how has affiliate marketing fared in 2020?

As advertisers and publishers return to some semblance of normalcy, it’s with a renewed investment in affiliate marketing.

With overall advertising budgets cut and digital spending growth forecasts slashed, the affiliate channel has offered a safe place to invest during the coronavirus pandemic. 

Awin’s global network has witnessed some spectacular growth across many of the verticals it operates in, with general retail seeing a 41% sales increase in Q2 compared to the first three months of the year. Performance varied dramatically between regions but every market saw at least double digit increases, with Spain outperforming its domestic and international neighbors: 

This is evidently a positive story and provides an impressive counterpoint to data recently released by eMarketer showing updated ad spend growth forecasts from a variety of markets:

Looking at eMarketer’s wider global picture, the research company estimates overall ad spend is set to decline by almost 5% in 2020. While digital will still grow – modestly – by 2.4%, this is significantly downgraded from their pre-pandemic predictions.

This represents a temporary setback, with next year set to see accelerated digital growth. Furthermore, eMarketer predicts that 2023 will see digital break the 60% of total adspend barrier.

Elsewhere, eMarketer has found that even previously Teflon-coated companies aren’t immune to combined challenges posed by COVID-19 and the ensuing recession. The Facebook and Google duopoly will see revenue growth slashed, with Google (previously impervious to any negative industry conditions) seeing its ad revenues dip by 3.3% this year. Facebook will continue to grab market share and experience an upward tick, albeit at much more modest levels.

Despite this, a consensus is emerging that lockdown conditions have supercharged e-commerce, setting brands on an irreversible path to significantly greater volumes of online sales that will require them to expedite their investments in all aspects of digital. Perhaps affiliate marketing has performed a safe holding option in 2020 as brands, fearful of striking tone deaf notes, pulled grand marketing plans and brand campaigns. For many publishers the message was typically business as usual… sales out the door, money in the bank.

But that picture is far more complex than a straightforward growth story. If 2020 teaches us anything, it’s that self-enforced economic damage has been felt far more deeply in certain sectors. And while there may be a positive story for publishers overall, performance has been mixed.

Let’s consider home and garden retailers in the UK. The first six months of 2020 effectively sends a message to businesses operating in the space to put their feet up for the rest of the year, with Awin’s sales to the start of July exceeding that of the whole of 2019, as seen in this monthly sales breakdown comparison for the sector:

Contrast that to the travel sector in Italy. As a country that went into severe lockdown early, Spring saw activity almost entirely dry up for two months. While June witnessed an encouraging bounceback, the ground to make up will presumably be insurmountable for some. Here the data is again presented on a monthly sales basis, 2019 compared to the year to date:

That performance is, of coursed, mirrored in the performance of specialized affiliates and publishers. It stands to reason that any active publisher in the verticals mentioned above will have either shared in the spoils or seen their revenues plummet.

While the vast majority of brands may have been content to run their affiliate campaigns uninterrupted, commission hikes, promotional commission rates and tenancies were paused or cut.

The effect was dramatic. A major publisher – used to selling marketing packages including commission increases – saw a significant plunge in tenancy earnings in Q2 compared to the previous three quarters:

So while they continued to trade ‘as normal’ tracking revenue and commissions – with the respective hikes in those sectors seeing uplift in revenue tracked – simple sales metrics ignored the bigger picture.

And performance did not just cut across advertiser verticals. There was a dramatic variance between core publisher categories when we consider Q2 sale uplift against Q1 across all verticals and territories:

The retail sector produced even more dramatic spikes:

We often talk about the ‘incentivized’ element of our industry: a cash, points or coupon reward in order for transacting. Discount or coupon sites alongside cashback portals have been strong drivers of affiliate growth over the past 15 years, but it is also interesting to see such a divergence between the two business models.

Perhaps cashback as a controllable mechanic and huge generator of sales was the easy target for brands if they wanted to dial down their programs without pausing them altogether. A telling indicator is the 16% slump in average cashback earned per sale, despite ongoing growth, indicative of cashback sites as an easy cost-cutting exercise.

There is an irony here in that study after study has shown them to be excellent sources of new and valuable customers. Fortunately we are starting to see programs reopen but it will be important to keep an eagle eye on all activity to ensure that revenue flows back into the channel through restored pre-pandemic cashback rates.

It is encouraging to see such positive quarterly growth elsewhere. Discount sites remained robust (often they are run at lower commission rates anyway) and comparison engines saw some of the biggest increases not just in retail sales, but also revenue (+107%), average order value (+24%) and ROI (+18%). Editorial and social continued their ongoing rise, proving invaluable as the pandemic drove first-time online shoppers into e-commerce sites.

Often in affiliate marketing there is so much data available, cutting across so many types of activity that it can be difficult to uncover the more local stories or hidden insights that tell of much bigger trends.

In the US, Amazon’s dramatic commission-cutting exercise proved an impressive driver of new affiliates to Awin and ShareASale. Typically, longtail publishers focused on niches helped contribute to a 550% increase in editorial sales across our US programs.

As we continue to delve into our data more patterns will emerge, highlighting positive growth stories and cautions against possible bad practice.

For more information on COVID-19, please visit our information hub where we bring you the latest news from Awin and ShareASale, as well as links to network insights and useful pointers, alongside wider updates. Additionally, ensure you’re kept up to date with the network’s news by signing up to our monthly Market Insights newsletter here.

The post Six months in, how has affiliate marketing fared in 2020? appeared first on ShareASale Blog.

,Read More

How publishers are selling advertisers on virtual events

Product launch events and branded pop-up experiences are no longer an option, so publishers, including Group Nine, Atlas Obscura and Bustle Digital Group are trying to sell their clients on virtual events instead.

So far, they’ve found some takers. Group Nine has hosted virtual dinner parties, Atlas Obscura has taught participants mind control and BDG offered viewers a much needed yoga break.

The revenue for a virtual built-if-sold event is in some cases lower. But costs can still pile up for publishers looking to go beyond a panel discussion.

“We have to make sure we set expectations,” said Group Nine CRO Geoff Schiller, adding that having a participatory event that’s able to integrate the brand’s products can be a stronger selling point than pure scale.

Atlas Obscura’s CEO Warren Webster said the margins are higher for Atlas Obscura’s events but the revenue is lower. He estimates that sponsorship revenue is about half of what it would be for in-person custom events. 

Virtual events are not going to require the same overhead costs that in-person events once had, but Eric Fleming, executive producer of experiential agency Makeout, said that that portion of brands’ experiential budgets need to be reallocated to other areas that are more in line with putting on a high quality virtual event. 

“There is still an investment required in creating a polished virtual experience,” said Fleming. “Brands and publishers should still expect to invest in order to truly have a quality experience for people who tune in and participate.” 

Schiller said he and his team went into virtual events programming thinking that it “would be higher margin, cheaper and more cost effective,” like it is for publishers “who do very straightforward, panel-like events.” 

Instead, what he said his team found was that the company’s virtual events costs were comparable to its offline ones. 

“There wasn’t a windfall of cost savings,” said Schiller. “It’s almost like you’re producing the Academy Awards. You need to factor in the elegance of the technology and getting the brand integration moments right in a way that is commensurate to the white glove service that we promise our clients.” 

Atlas Obscura, which makes half its annual revenue from events, had an existing experiential partnership with Airbnb that’s now virtual as well. Rather than sending people on a $30 trip “Exploring a Secret Fort” outside of Washington, D.C., attendees can pay $35 to learn mind control from mentalist and mind reader Vinny DePonto.

The publisher also launched new custom virtual events, including a virtual premiere for the documentary “Spaceship Earth” for movie production studio Neon. The premiere included a conversation between the main characters of the documentary and moderator LeVar Burton. It was meant to replicate the post-viewing panel that takes place on stage at in-person premieres, according to Webster. That event brought in 32,000 views, an audience several times bigger than a typical movie theater would be able to accommodate.

Group Nine has done two virtual built-if-sold events since going remote, according to Schiller, both sold to Campbell Soup. 

Its first event, called the Dinner Party Bingo Bash, was an interview show that had a simultaneous bingo game hosted by chef and author Daphne Oz. It was live streamed on PopSugar’s Facebook page. Viewers were invited to cook along to a recipe with Oz using Campbell’s Swanson brand products and were brought on screen to ask her questions throughout. That event brought in 20,000 views.

The second event was more intimate, called the Soupchat Book Club. Sarah Pekkanen and Greer Hendricks’ discussed their new book, “You Are Not Alone,” and the first 100 participants that RSVP’d were sent copies of the book along with a can of Campbell’s soup.

Bustle planned to host an afternoon-long yoga retreat in Austin, Texas this spring for vitamin and supplement brand Nature’s Way. After it was unable to take place, Elizabeth Webbe Lunny, BDG’s evp of revenue, said her team moved the retreat online and was able to keep the same format and instructor and was able to translate nearly all of the programming online. 

Initially, 120 people were set to attend the Austin-based event, but the virtual event brought in 400 attendees. The KPIs stayed relatively consistent as well with the in-person format, she said. Those included the number of attendees, engagement and how people were showing up and being active.

Webbe Lunny said that the client was happy with the added value from the increase in attendees and her team was able to maintain the same initial pricing.

Year over year, Schiller said that he does not expect to make as much revenue as the experiential business contributed in 2019 — the company held more than 70 events across its five brands and Schiller said the team is not trying to get anywhere close to that volume — but a large reason for that was the decision to postpone its “cornerstone” event Play/Ground to 2021.

The post How publishers are selling advertisers on virtual events appeared first on Digiday.

,Read More