How to Approach Supplier Contracts in Affiliate Marketing

The last few months have been challenging, but also a chance for companies to review their current marketing activities and suppliers.

We often engage with new clients when they are unhappy or feel they have outgrown their current supplier.  One of the issues they run into is that they have long terms left to go on their contracts, sometimes up to 18 months. But are long term contracts bad, or even avoidable?

Why do suppliers request long-term contracts? 

The investment it takes to work with a new client is significant; the cost is often higher than the return for an initial period. Depending on the size of the contract, it could mean employing more people, investing in new technology or services. Companies need to protect themselves and not risk a high upfront investment for a neutral or negative return. 

Many suppliers request rolling contracts or auto-renewal terms. The benefit of this is that you don’t need to get into distracting and lengthy contract discussions every renewal date.  The downside is that if you are not aware of this, you could end up in a longer-term contract than planned. 

Why would a client approve a long-term contract? 

Often contracts are dealt with by procurement, not by the marketing teams using the services.  Last year I attended an enlightening session by someone that had a lengthy career in procurement. They have targets to hit, and quotas to reach like any other part of the business, and signing an improved deal on a 3-year contract might well be part of that.  It’s also positive that an advertiser might want to commit to a long term engagement with a supplier; it shows loyalty, trust and the desire to build a long term partnership. 

There is an alternative view, that if you are doing an excellent job for a client, why do you need a contract term, they won’t want to leave you? 

Contracts are not a problem when things are going well; they only become a problem when things are not going so well, for either advertiser or supplier.  So what’s the answer, how do you create a term length that is acceptable to all parties?

A quote I always remember is “In a good negotiation, both sides are unhappy”, the point being that to build a good relationship, both sides have to make compromises. 

Key areas to consider when approaching contracts

It’s fair for a supplier to ask for a term that protects their business and investment into your programme, it’s also reasonable for advertisers to have protection if things don’t go to plan.  

A few areas to consider for current and future contracts:

  • Is there an auto-renewal or rolling contract term? Know the date this triggers from and what conditions are in place after that date (i.e. termination, contract term).
  • Be fair in your compromises. You want a supplier that is motivated and able to perform for you.  If one party feels more beat up than the other, it doesn’t bode well for a future relationship. 
  • Ensure your pricing is fair, cheap isn’t always best. As a general rule, the more you invest, the better outcome you get. 
  • Set service level expectations and KPIs from the start. Everyone is aligned and clear on what the measure of success is. 
  • Check your out clause, especially if this is a new service or partner. Make sure you can get out if things are not going as planned, such as an early break clause or failure to deliver the services to an agreed standard or KPIs. 
  • Consider the future implications of the contract term.  While it may feel great now, what if that changes, what if your team changes? Think about elements you can weave into the contract to mitigate these issues. 
  • Use a long-term commitment to your advantage; ask for a discount on price or additional services. 

Ultimately, the purpose of a contract is to protect businesses and people. Understanding what both parties want from the relationship, what your compromises are and measuring risk are crucial to getting to an agreement which works for everyone. 

The post How to Approach Supplier Contracts in Affiliate Marketing appeared first on PerformanceIN.

,Read More

Six months in, how has affiliate marketing fared in 2020?

As advertisers and publishers return to some semblance of normalcy, it’s with a renewed investment in affiliate marketing.

With overall advertising budgets cut and digital spending growth forecasts slashed, the affiliate channel has offered a safe place to invest during the coronavirus pandemic. 

Awin’s global network has witnessed some spectacular growth across many of the verticals it operates in, with general retail seeing a 41% sales increase in Q2 compared to the first three months of the year. Performance varied dramatically between regions but every market saw at least double digit increases, with Spain outperforming its domestic and international neighbors: 

This is evidently a positive story and provides an impressive counterpoint to data recently released by eMarketer showing updated ad spend growth forecasts from a variety of markets:

Looking at eMarketer’s wider global picture, the research company estimates overall ad spend is set to decline by almost 5% in 2020. While digital will still grow – modestly – by 2.4%, this is significantly downgraded from their pre-pandemic predictions.

This represents a temporary setback, with next year set to see accelerated digital growth. Furthermore, eMarketer predicts that 2023 will see digital break the 60% of total adspend barrier.

Elsewhere, eMarketer has found that even previously Teflon-coated companies aren’t immune to combined challenges posed by COVID-19 and the ensuing recession. The Facebook and Google duopoly will see revenue growth slashed, with Google (previously impervious to any negative industry conditions) seeing its ad revenues dip by 3.3% this year. Facebook will continue to grab market share and experience an upward tick, albeit at much more modest levels.

Despite this, a consensus is emerging that lockdown conditions have supercharged e-commerce, setting brands on an irreversible path to significantly greater volumes of online sales that will require them to expedite their investments in all aspects of digital. Perhaps affiliate marketing has performed a safe holding option in 2020 as brands, fearful of striking tone deaf notes, pulled grand marketing plans and brand campaigns. For many publishers the message was typically business as usual… sales out the door, money in the bank.

But that picture is far more complex than a straightforward growth story. If 2020 teaches us anything, it’s that self-enforced economic damage has been felt far more deeply in certain sectors. And while there may be a positive story for publishers overall, performance has been mixed.

Let’s consider home and garden retailers in the UK. The first six months of 2020 effectively sends a message to businesses operating in the space to put their feet up for the rest of the year, with Awin’s sales to the start of July exceeding that of the whole of 2019, as seen in this monthly sales breakdown comparison for the sector:

Contrast that to the travel sector in Italy. As a country that went into severe lockdown early, Spring saw activity almost entirely dry up for two months. While June witnessed an encouraging bounceback, the ground to make up will presumably be insurmountable for some. Here the data is again presented on a monthly sales basis, 2019 compared to the year to date:

That performance is, of coursed, mirrored in the performance of specialized affiliates and publishers. It stands to reason that any active publisher in the verticals mentioned above will have either shared in the spoils or seen their revenues plummet.

While the vast majority of brands may have been content to run their affiliate campaigns uninterrupted, commission hikes, promotional commission rates and tenancies were paused or cut.

The effect was dramatic. A major publisher – used to selling marketing packages including commission increases – saw a significant plunge in tenancy earnings in Q2 compared to the previous three quarters:

So while they continued to trade ‘as normal’ tracking revenue and commissions – with the respective hikes in those sectors seeing uplift in revenue tracked – simple sales metrics ignored the bigger picture.

And performance did not just cut across advertiser verticals. There was a dramatic variance between core publisher categories when we consider Q2 sale uplift against Q1 across all verticals and territories:

The retail sector produced even more dramatic spikes:

We often talk about the ‘incentivized’ element of our industry: a cash, points or coupon reward in order for transacting. Discount or coupon sites alongside cashback portals have been strong drivers of affiliate growth over the past 15 years, but it is also interesting to see such a divergence between the two business models.

Perhaps cashback as a controllable mechanic and huge generator of sales was the easy target for brands if they wanted to dial down their programs without pausing them altogether. A telling indicator is the 16% slump in average cashback earned per sale, despite ongoing growth, indicative of cashback sites as an easy cost-cutting exercise.

There is an irony here in that study after study has shown them to be excellent sources of new and valuable customers. Fortunately we are starting to see programs reopen but it will be important to keep an eagle eye on all activity to ensure that revenue flows back into the channel through restored pre-pandemic cashback rates.

It is encouraging to see such positive quarterly growth elsewhere. Discount sites remained robust (often they are run at lower commission rates anyway) and comparison engines saw some of the biggest increases not just in retail sales, but also revenue (+107%), average order value (+24%) and ROI (+18%). Editorial and social continued their ongoing rise, proving invaluable as the pandemic drove first-time online shoppers into e-commerce sites.

Often in affiliate marketing there is so much data available, cutting across so many types of activity that it can be difficult to uncover the more local stories or hidden insights that tell of much bigger trends.

In the US, Amazon’s dramatic commission-cutting exercise proved an impressive driver of new affiliates to Awin and ShareASale. Typically, longtail publishers focused on niches helped contribute to a 550% increase in editorial sales across our US programs.

As we continue to delve into our data more patterns will emerge, highlighting positive growth stories and cautions against possible bad practice.

For more information on COVID-19, please visit our information hub where we bring you the latest news from Awin and ShareASale, as well as links to network insights and useful pointers, alongside wider updates. Additionally, ensure you’re kept up to date with the network’s news by signing up to our monthly Market Insights newsletter here.

The post Six months in, how has affiliate marketing fared in 2020? appeared first on ShareASale Blog.

,Read More