As advertisers boycott Facebook, publishers see video ad revenue fall in July

Publishers’ social video revenue rollercoaster continues. After seeing video ad dollars on Facebook rebound since April, some publishers have observed a downturn in July, coinciding with hundreds of advertisers boycotting the social network.

Publishers’ Facebook video ad revenue in July has fallen anywhere from 10% to 50% below the June mark, according to executives at three publishers. However, the executives said it is hard to know how much of that decline to attribute to the advertiser boycott, which is connected to the “Stop Hate for Profit” campaign calling for Facebook to do a better job combating hate speech on its platform.

Publishers cited various factors that could be contributing to the July revenue drop. For starters, the coronavirus crisis continues to weigh down ad dollars. Additionally, July marks the start of the third quarter, and the beginning of any quarter generally sees weaker advertiser demand compared to other periods, the publishers said. And then there’s the advertiser boycott. Many of the companies boycotting Facebook are major brand advertisers like Coca-Cola, Ford and Levi’s that are considered by publishers to be more likely to spend that money on video ads than the small- and medium-sized businesses that make up the bulk of Facebook’s advertiser base.

“I don’t think you can draw any clear conclusions from this moment about the decline in ad spend. You can still see the effects of the pandemic and some of that is now converging with this boycott,” said one publisher.

In some cases, publishers have been able to draw a direct connection between the Facebook video ad revenue decline and the advertiser boycott. A second publisher said they have had advertisers redirect upwards of a quarter-million dollars from the media company’s Facebook videos to its YouTube videos because of the boycott. 

Meanwhile, one of the publishers has joined the boycott itself by opting not to run ads on Facebook to promote its videos and increase viewership, though it is still uploading organic videos to the platform and receiving ad revenue from them. Another of the publishers had considered joining the boycott but opted against because of the potential impact doing so could have on its overall revenue, such as its commerce business that generates more revenue for the company than its Facebook videos.

Publishers’ social video ad revenues bottomed out across Facebook, YouTube and Snapchat in early April. Since then, they have rebounded, and some media executives thought the trajectory could lead to a full recovery back to pre-crisis levels as early as July. Publishers were disabused of that hope by the first week of July, though. 

After the first week of July, one of the publishers saw that its Facebook video ad revenue for July was on pace to be 35% lower than the June figure, with Facebook video ad CPMs down 18% in July compared to June. But it seems that the initial downswing may have had more to do with the Fourth of July holiday than the advertiser boycott. As of mid-July, this publisher saw its Facebook video ad CPMs rebound to be $1 higher than they were at the beginning of July and 10% lower than their June average, with revenue on pace to be 16% lower in July compared to June.

While the publishers did not welcome the revenue decline, they had feared it would be worse than what they are currently seeing. “It’s a little bit lower than June, but not that bad. I was predicting we would be back to where we were in April,” said a third publisher. Of course, July is only half over.

The post As advertisers boycott Facebook, publishers see video ad revenue fall in July appeared first on Digiday.

,Read More

The Sales Funnel: How Brand & Performance Marketing are Aligning

There has never been a better time for businesses to optimise each stage of the sales and marketing process. Covid-19 has rapidly sped up online migration with people working from home, on furlough, or simply unable to work. With this new shift in consumer behaviour likely to continue in a post-COVID-19 world, businesses are under increasing pressure to adopt a digital strategy when targeting consumers.

Lockdown is a prime example of the importance of adopting an agile marketing strategy. Traditional forms of marketing, like advertising billboards and adverts on the sides of buses, proved ineffective in a world where everyone was confined to the four walls of their homes. They simply were not achieving their intended audience reach, leading businesses to adopt a ‘digitise or get left behind’ approach when it came to their marketing strategy.

Consumers are spending more time online than ever before. And whilst this behaviour was initially forced through the Covid-19 pandemic, it is likely that this will become a longer lasting habit. Sales funnels that traditionally started with offline branding adverts and moved to online performance campaigns, now need to adapt if they are to survive and prevent drowning in the sea of brands that have already suffered from not digitising.

The importance of tracking

Performance marketing has always differentiated itself from branding with its more tracking-focused approach. Because of this, one of the biggest gulfs between these two marketing tactics lies in their physical presence: performance being online and brand being offline. Until now…

Tracking is essential when it comes to understanding how customers interact with companies before a purchase is made. Simply tracking first click and last click, which tend to be the most popular attribution models, neglects other aspects of the journey which influence the sale. By adopting a linear approach, all touchpoints in the customer’s journey are given equal credit allowing for better insight into how the campaign is performing from a full funnel perspective.

The rise of the online marketplace

With more consumers embracing online opportunities, businesses have needed to embrace e-commerce opportunities in order to continue to drive sales. Direct To Consumer (DTC) marketplaces are a great way of allowing businesses to open up additional revenue streams, and even prior to the Covid-19 pandemic stood out as one of the top-rising retail trends. 

Unlike traditional brick-and-mortar retailers and e-commerce marketplaces, DTC offers a more effective way of building engagement with customers, resulting in better data-driven feedback and contributing towards more accurate forecasting. It is also fundamental when it comes to building brand loyalty through personalisation and customer reviews, as well as allowing end-to-end control of the customer experience.

Why brand and performance marketing need to work together

Historically many businesses have had a stronger focus on brand marketing, sometimes unknowingly at the expense of their performance marketing. The challenge lies in aligning brand and performance marketing when the two operate at different ends of the sales funnel. This is where adopting a full-funnel approach, identifying Lifetime Value (LTV) adverts and keywords are beneficial in encouraging repeat custom. By optimising a marketing campaign it is possible to identify which elements are producing the best results, and generating high-value customers. It is these performance-orientated metrics which are so valuable in being able to offer a personalised experience.

Building brand awareness and generating leads 

The first step is acknowledging the value of the top of funnel (TOFU) brand building activity and generating qualified leads. Whilst its primary focus is on increasing awareness and audience reach, rather than revenue, it’s important to remember that brand drives performance.

Brand recognition is also key in influencing a sale. A potential customer is less likely to invest in a product they are unfamiliar with, particularly if there is a well-known and recognised comparable alternative.

Strong content marketing through blog posts, or PPC marketing such as Google or Facebook adverts, which link back to relevant landing pages on the website help to encourage customer engagement. Repeated exposure to the same brand creates familiarity, keeping a brand front-of-mind during the research process before a purchase is made.

Having a greater understanding of customer behaviour at the beginning of the journey can lead to greater efficiencies further down the funnel. It also allows for branding to be measured in a more data driven manner than before. By measuring the traffic generated by individual ads, you can see clearer which brand messages work better than others.

How to improve the evaluation process

The middle of funnel (MOFU) is where the customer will spend time researching and considering their potential purchase, through a variety of different touchpoints. For example, a potential customer searching to buy a red dress via a search engine is more likely to click on an advert if it is number one in the ranks. Once visiting the website, it’s likely they will continue to visit other websites whilst going about their day. Through remarketing, a second advert for the same red dress may appear on their social network, encouraging clicks again, leading to a purchase. Two touchpoints. One sale. 

It is at this stage of the funnel where online and offline marketing techniques can work hand-in-hand in terms of offering an all-round experience. For example, if a campaign’s objective is to drive more footfall to a particular store, this can be carried out by targeting users within a certain radius of a store, showing them where their nearest location is, and highlighting any particular sales. 

Conversion to sale

The bottom of funnel (BOFU) is a two stage process – both the sale itself and then the aftersales. Again PPC marketing and SEO are techniques that can be applied here, as well as remarketing. Targeting less ‘informational’ keywords that potential customers search for in the discovery phase, such as “where to buy a mobile phone”, and targeting more ‘transactional’ keywords that users search for when they are ready to buy, such as “buy mobile phone now”, is a good way to grab users at the bottom of the funnel. 

Performance marketing will by nature remain sales-centric, focusing on short-term revenue as part of the conversion process, and so also forms part of the bottom of the funnel process. Therefore, revenue and ROI are the metrics used to determine success instead of traffic. 

Why brand and performance marketing need to be aligned

Ultimately, the online migration was always going to happen, but Covid-19 has made it imminent. What it has highlighted is that brand and performance marketing should not be treated as separate elements of a marketing campaign, rather they should be seen as being interdependent upon each other. A balance that is essential when it comes to business growth.

Adopting a full funnel approach allows an online presence to be considered at all three stages of the funnel – top, middle and bottom – increasing the chances of a sale to be achieved, by creating cohesion across all activity at every point the customer will come into contact with your company. 

The post The Sales Funnel: How Brand & Performance Marketing are Aligning appeared first on PerformanceIN.

,Read More