The numbers behind the WPP whistleblower case tell a story of their own

The lawsuit between former GroupM executive Richard Foster and WPP is full of competing allegations. But buried in the court filings is a set of numbers — drawn largely from GroupM’s own internal documents — that tell a story worth understanding on its own terms.

Related Insights


Here’s what the data actually shows, broken down by what it refers to.

How big GroupM was (and how it allegedly made money)

At its peak, GroupM controlled roughly $60 billion in annual client advertising spend, giving it between 20% and 50% market share in key global markets. That scale was the source of its power: the more client money it aggregated, the better the deals it could extract from media vendors.

Continue reading this article on digiday.com. Sign up for Digiday newsletters to get the latest on media, marketing and the future of TV.

,Read More

‘An ethics issue’: Why some creators are re-auditing their brand deals after Hootsuite-ICE controversy

Subscribe: Apple PodcastsSpotify

At the start of this year, Vancouver-based tech company Hootsuite came under fire over a contract with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). DHS oversees Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE. News of the tech company’s partnership made its rounds online, prompting some creators to end their own partnerships with Hootsuite.

Tameka Bazile was one of those creators. Bazile said she was concerned that Hootsuite’s social‑media management and monitoring tools would allow ICE to track and surveil online users. Hootsuite CEO Irina Novoselsky has refuted those claims, saying that its contract with ICE does not include tracking or surveillance of individuals, according to CBC News. Digiday reached out to Hootsuite to understand its approach to creator partnerships after the fallout.

Continue reading this article on digiday.com. Sign up for Digiday newsletters to get the latest on media, marketing and the future of TV.

,Read More