Marketers are keen to use generative AI in ad campaigns, but hidden costs lurk

Marketers hope that using AI technology will cut down on time spent producing creative assets, allowing them to cut costs — or scale up their operations. In the campaign to cut weeks into hours, however, hidden costs remain.

Top talent is scarce; human oversight and meddling eats into newly gained margins; and realizing meaningful economies of scale can mean investing considerable cash and time upfront in order to build a working creative assembly line.

Though difficult to assign a dollar value against, each of them represent an underwater rock that might hole an AI-assisted creative team below the waterline.

Continue reading this article on digiday.com. Sign up for Digiday newsletters to get the latest on media, marketing and the future of TV.

,Read More

Despite the hype, agentic AI isn’t ready to take the brand controls just yet

Agentic AI has grandiose ambitions, promising marketers ideation and execution all in the same go with little oversight. The reality, however, is that humans still have the wheel.

For the better part of 2025, agentic AI has been the industry’s buzzword. It’s defined as “a situation where multiple AI agents work together to complete complex tasks, with minimal oversight or intervention from a human user,” as Digiday explains it. The minimal oversight from a human user, however, seems to be the hangup keeping marketers from embracing agentic AI’s full autonomy.

“It’s not just ready to go from generation [to publication],” said Karen Rodriguez, senior content marketing manager at New American Funding. 

Continue reading this article on digiday.com. Sign up for Digiday newsletters to get the latest on media, marketing and the future of TV.

,Read More